cRPG

Strategus => Strategus General Discussion => Topic started by: betard_lulz on February 24, 2014, 06:43:10 pm

Title: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: betard_lulz on February 24, 2014, 06:43:10 pm
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)

SO yea guys like I thought we were gonna not play trade simulator. But thats just me. I've always liked strat for the XP and battles not really hey everyone lets join with LCO and Goblins to have this one huge bandwagon alliance to help everyone get their little pixel villages and then sit around wasteing sooooo many troops/ potential for XP.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Relit on February 24, 2014, 06:47:10 pm
Its the very beginning of strat. Good xp is not going to happen for a while yet.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on February 24, 2014, 06:48:11 pm
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)

SO yea guys like I thought we were gonna not play trade simulator. But thats just me. I've always liked strat for the XP and battles not really hey everyone lets join with LCO and Goblins to have this one huge bandwagon alliance to help everyone get their little pixel villages and then sit around wasteing sooooo many troops/ potential for XP.

Reporting you to moderators for shitposting.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: betard_lulz on February 24, 2014, 06:48:58 pm
(click to show/hide)

Well sir I do hope so. I do not hope for one giant clusterf alliance taking villages "for free" at the beginning of strat followed by trade simulator 2014
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: betard_lulz on February 24, 2014, 06:49:46 pm
somebody doesnt like my giant alliance thats gonna try and take over the strat map to play trade simulator
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on February 24, 2014, 06:51:02 pm
My faction made significantly more battles, more XP, and more fun than any of the things you've ever contributed to, you assmunching shit baby.

All people recognize you as is that one retard that occasionally makes really bad threads thinking that he's trolling people. Go back to /b/ you jizz sock of a player.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: betard_lulz on February 24, 2014, 06:53:37 pm
(click to show/hide)
oh no im not internet famous on a dead mod someone halp. anyways I don't have time for autists like you goblin.

All I'm saying is whats the point of strat? Fighting or trading?
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on February 24, 2014, 06:56:19 pm
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: loleznub on February 24, 2014, 06:59:28 pm
(click to show/hide)
oh no im not internet famous on a dead mod someone halp. anyways I don't have time for autists like you goblin.

All I'm saying is whats the point of strat? Fighting or trading?

They don't want a challenge, so I say we just let them take the fiefs for free just to boost their E-Peen.  Then after two months of doing nothing we can wipe strategus and do it again.  Peasant battles are more fun than full plate anyways.

Edit: 

Or maybe we could hard code in something to where the attackers can only have 5 or so extra people than the defenders if the roster isn't full to keep it fair.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: imisshotmail on February 24, 2014, 07:03:06 pm
All I'm saying is whats the point of strat? Fighting or trading?

Gobblins are already at war with Hospitallers (as are we) so what the fuck are you even talking about?
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: betard_lulz on February 24, 2014, 07:05:29 pm
Gobblins are already at war with Hospitallers (as are we) so what the fuck are you even talking about?
and thats great. What i'm talking about is having like 80 merc for the attackers v. 10 tops sign up for villages
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: loleznub on February 24, 2014, 07:08:24 pm
Gobblins are already at war with Hospitallers (as are we) so what the fuck are you even talking about?

I'm surprised gobblins would want to be associated with GFORCE.  I'd think they would be too scared of you guys recording all the conversation to use as blackmail.

Can we get an official post in diplomacy from gobblins kthx
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: imisshotmail on February 24, 2014, 07:10:12 pm
and thats great. What i'm talking about is having like 80 merc for the attackers v. 10 tops sign up for villages

Villages are never going to win against an attacker anyway if they're in the slightest competent, noone gives a shit about signing up for a village to maybe inflict 50 more tickets casualties. Just wait a few days-weeks for real faction vs faction battles to happen.


I'm surprised gobblins would want to be associated with GFORCE.  I'd think they would be too scared of you guys recording all the conversation to use as blackmail.

Nah we only record autists.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on February 24, 2014, 07:11:37 pm
I'm surprised gobblins would want to be associated with GFORCE.  I'd think they would be too scared of you guys recording all the conversation to use as blackmail.

Can we get an official post in diplomacy from gobblins kthx

See the thing is I have nothing to fear because I don't go into full on mountain dew and shit-filled diaper rages about cRPG diplomacy (unlike some people) so I have very little fear about my private conversations being revealed.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: betard_lulz on February 24, 2014, 07:14:45 pm
(click to show/hide)
See the thing is just judging based off of the sheer amount of ad hominem you use when addressing something you dont agree with you do indeed go into "full on mountain dew and shit-filled diaper rages" but I suppose time shall tell if we see something like EU develop over here in NA strat.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: loleznub on February 24, 2014, 07:22:45 pm
See the thing is I have nothing to fear because I don't go into full on mountain dew and shit-filled diaper rages about cRPG diplomacy (unlike some people) so I have very little fear about my private conversations being revealed.

I believe you're misunderstanding my statement (to be expected from a gobblin though, nothing surprising) 

Let's say you are in a private channel talking about what's going to happen this strat.  You say what your end goal is and reveal your super secret base of operations, which turns out to be a large chasm hidden inside the mountains only accessible by a single route. 

Now let's fast forward 3 weeks and there's a city GFORCE wants that you have.  Now you either give them the city, or have the recording posted giving specific directions on how to access the Gobblins super secret mountain chasm.


Also, you got pretty into it here ;)

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Keshian on February 24, 2014, 07:26:32 pm
I was really enjoying these ai fights - lot of fun both in na and eu with near equal mercs on both sides.  But the second Occitan, Mates, Gobblins do their battles its 50 v 15.  Where is the fun in that?  Do we really have to have half the playerbase allied at day 1 (same people that were working together at end of strat 4)?  Are we really going to become even gayer than EU was last strategus?

Gobblins and Les Chevalieres Occitan are the two biggest NA factions by numbers (by a large margin too), can you at least try not to have 100% mercing for each other from day 1?
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on February 24, 2014, 07:29:17 pm
We're not the largest factions though, shitrock.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Keshian on February 24, 2014, 07:39:11 pm
We're not the largest factions though, shitrock.

Name two larger?

Though it seems everyone else is also scared to piss off the large alliance.  NA primetime and only 15 mercs, while all of EU has 50 or more signed up on defense of AI fiefs. For shame, to be out-done by Euros, for shame.  Makes me sad to be called 'Merican.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on February 24, 2014, 08:06:17 pm
The M8s, Acre

Check the numbers you shit idiot and admit you were wrong.

EDIT: Should I get Dairy Queen or Jack in the Box for dinner?
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: MURDERTRON on February 24, 2014, 08:33:20 pm
If you keep villages and other fiefs out of the hands of players, you can actually assure yourself that the battles will never get good.  So in reality, it's good to help people get their villages, as long as you are neutral or friendly with them.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Artyem on February 24, 2014, 08:54:00 pm
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Butan on February 24, 2014, 09:41:28 pm
Wow, and here I was going to complain we were having decreased AI applications (from around 80 to 30-60 people on average) in our latest ai fiefs defense EU side.

How does the ai hire applicants really anyway? I would understand if thats a bit secret though.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Deltah on February 24, 2014, 09:53:28 pm
It's been like a week and you my old friends are already fighting over "THE HONORABLE DEFENSE OF AN AI VILLAGE." Seriously just shut the fuck up already with your shit. It is a fucking video game. If you don't like getting dunked on then don't play.

"omg his faction is larger/smaller/skilled/ping/mercs/gayer than mine" "omg hes picking on me"

Stow it.

If you want to be playing the propaganda/ultrahardick diplomacy game then go play eve online.

P.S. daruvian should have Dairy Queen, just saying.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on February 24, 2014, 09:54:30 pm
Eating DQ chicken strips right now BTW
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Nightmare798 on February 24, 2014, 09:56:13 pm
Reporting you to moderators for shitposting.

You call his post shitposting? Take look at yours!
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: loleznub on February 24, 2014, 11:45:19 pm
You call his post shitposting? Take look at yours!

I thought we all understood he is allowed to shitpost, considering the rules don't apply to him and admins enforce that.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on February 24, 2014, 11:52:02 pm
Besides the whole "betard_lulz" thing which makes my autism flare up like little else can, what did you expect out of Strategus 5 being a week old or less?

There will be plenty of fights. Please, wait at least a few weeks before passing judgement. Really, what you want is 1mil XP battles every day, I think. Sorry, but that ain't gonna happen for quite a while.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on February 24, 2014, 11:57:22 pm
I thought we all understood he is allowed to shitpost, considering the rules don't apply to him and admins enforce that.

You clearly don't know how many times I've been muted.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Lt_Anders on February 25, 2014, 12:08:21 am
Fighting 200 v 600 is worthless AI defence. Get lowish xp, no silver...What's the point?
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Keshian on February 25, 2014, 01:51:22 am
The M8s, Acre


Nah, both are smaller.  Acre for sure is not your size.  Mates might be getting closer adding GoW.  Most of ravens and dracul joined gobblins so you guys are even bigger than last strat when you were one of the largest factions, combine that with the alliance with GForce (chaos and the old gforce guys) and you are definitely the largest conglomerate on the map with les chevalieres occitan competing up there with you.

Its sad the only factions changing up their diplomacy from last strat are Hospitallers and the small clans.  The NA battles were fun but these four tonight are turning out pretty gay with 45 v 15 every fight (occitan, gobblins, gforce all not mercing against each other for all 4 battles).
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Relit on February 25, 2014, 02:26:22 am
Nah, both are smaller.  Acre for sure is not your size.  Mates might be getting closer adding GoW.  Most of ravens ...

About a third of Raven joined the GOBBLINs. The rest have quit or are actively seeking other factions. Lets not pull numbers out of thin air, shall we?
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: imisshotmail on February 25, 2014, 02:26:40 am
Holy fuck kesh shut up you autist.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Keshian on February 25, 2014, 02:27:42 am
About a third of Raven joined the GOBBLINs. The rest have quit or are actively seeking other factions. Lets not pull numbers out of thin air, shall we?

Sorry would "largest chunck of ravens and dracul going to any one faction" make you happy.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on February 25, 2014, 02:31:12 am
Sorry would "largest chunck of ravens and dracul going to any one faction" make you happy.

no actually I think he called you an autist and told you to shut up, not restate your opinion

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Relit on February 25, 2014, 02:32:35 am
no actually I think he called you an autist and told you to shut up, not restate your opinion

(click to show/hide)

Hah. Close enough.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Artyem on February 25, 2014, 02:34:43 am
Kesh get the dick out of your ass and chill the fuck out, it's only a week into strat and only four factions even own a village.  Can't you at least wait a month before pulling the underdog card?
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Keshian on February 25, 2014, 02:42:09 am
Kesh get the dick out of your ass and chill the fuck out, it's only a week into strat and only four factions even own a village.  Can't you at least wait a month before pulling the underdog card?

What are you even babbling about underdog?  I just want xp and fun fights not the 3 largest factions all kissing up to each other to basically hand over ai villages over without a real fight.  Other people not in your giant factions are complaining about the same thing.  Its boring and predictable and unoriginal.  At least Euros get full rosters on both sides instead of pulling this lame ass-kissing.

Strat is about fighting and fun battles and you guys are too busy dick-sucking each other and trying to put people that complain down to realize you are doing the same shit that killed EU strat last round - mega-alliances from day 1.  I really thought us not doing FCC would see you guys be more original but all its done is leave all you spergs allied together to suck each other's dicks beating up what few small factions are not allied with you. 

I love strat and it just sucks to see spergs already looking to make the NA side one big circle-jerk instead of a competitive game.  Every NA primetime battle tonight is 45 v 15-20 - little more than fief transfers from ai and you actually don't think something is wrong with that?
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: HappyPhantom on February 25, 2014, 02:42:22 am
Kesh get the dick out of your ass and chill the fuck out, it's only a week into strat and only four factions even own a village.  Can't you at least wait a month before pulling the underdog card?

Yeah, FFS, let ME pull the underdog card.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: KaMiKaZe_JoE on February 25, 2014, 03:09:01 am
Gobblins are shitty baddies and need to crutch on a EU backed mega alliance

Little do you baddie nerdy butt-faces realize that your gobblin horde is actually crutching on the player bases of clans funded entirely by EU super conglomerates. You think you've got it all figured out? You'll win it all? You baddie faces will capture the whole of NA, yeah, only to have your "allies" stab you in the cooch and turn it all around on you. And the gobblin banner will be torn down, replaced by the hammer and sickle of the EU hordes.

First the Maine, now this. When will we learn, I ask you all?
 
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Artyem on February 25, 2014, 03:14:46 am
waaaaaahh

Kesh get the dick out of your ass and chill the fuck out, it's only a week into strat and only four factions even own a village.

you're getting mad at a video game because a 600 vs 200 village defense wasn't stacked 44 vs 80, why do you even care?
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on February 25, 2014, 03:17:12 am
i'm visibly upset because people don't want to fight on a side that is nearly promised to lose, will have no leadership or teamspeak to coordinate in, has no brand-recognition or stake in anything and will no longer exist after a single battle

lol
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: MURDERTRON on February 25, 2014, 03:25:05 am
Kesh man, they're just villagers.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Butan on February 25, 2014, 03:26:21 am
Quote
People don't want to fight on a side that is nearly promised to lose, will have no leadership or teamspeak to coordinate in, has no brand-recognition or stake in anything and will no longer exist after a single battle.

This is the effect, the cause IS alliances.

If the few people that cares just bundle up, whats the point of people trying to fight. Not everyone want to lead, but those who does and actively seek out diplomatical options that will bore the hell out of everyone are serious party poopers.



(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: betard_lulz on February 25, 2014, 04:00:42 am
ITT: we arent handing over villages to one another we just are mercing exclusively on one side. stfu kesh you have valid points so I'll resort to ad hominem for upboats
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: BaleOhay on February 25, 2014, 04:05:47 am
the way kesh says things are generally wrong.... however the message he fails to get across properly is generally right on the money. This strat will likely blow because all the big kids on the block are to afraid to fight eachother. Instead they will pat each other on the back and say nice job as they team up to kick the little kids.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: imisshotmail on February 25, 2014, 04:08:01 am
*kesh takes hit off asthma inhaler and scrolls down thread* ok lets see what we've got here, dude called betard_lulz says one of only 2 clans at war so far is wanting a "trading simulator", ok thats fine, some hospitaller dork posting multiple paragraphs about gforce being untrustworthy, very cool, an autist european giving his opinion when noone cares, hmm i guess ill take it. wait whats this??gobblins in diplomacy?? nwot in MY fworwum *starts wheezing aggressively*
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: betard_lulz on February 25, 2014, 04:08:15 am
It is indeed unfortunate how this strat is already shaping up. I just hope that some time in the near future after trading simulator 2015 is in full swing that the fights will break out.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: betard_lulz on February 25, 2014, 04:09:44 am
(click to show/hide)
Actually we had a game admin tell kesh to take his dick out of his ass. soooooo i think i can chalk that one up to trade simulator 2015 being in full force here shortly.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Artyem on February 25, 2014, 06:50:54 am
(click to show/hide)
Actually we had a game admin tell kesh to take his dick out of his ass. soooooo i think i can chalk that one up to trade simulator 2015 being in full force here shortly.

what


I feel like I'm reading the world wide truth movement facebook page right now, as far as I know the current GOBBLIN relations with Occitan are neutral.  We haven't made any secret underground pacts or trade agreements to skew the teams on an AI village defense and we're not teaming up with them to do jack shit.  Closest thing we've come to that is our apparent alliance with the GFORCE crew, but I guess according to you guys that's going to break the game.

You guys are blowing your spergloads a little too early on this one, considering there isn't a single faction with 2 villages yet in NA.  The only battles we're seeing right now (and for the following couple of weeks, I imagine) are battles against AI villages with 200 population and the occasional small lightly armed field battles.

tl;dr calm down, strat 5 is only a week old
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Keshian on February 25, 2014, 07:31:20 am
what


I feel like I'm reading the world wide truth movement facebook page right now, as far as I know the current GOBBLIN relations with Occitan are neutral.  We haven't made any secret underground pacts or trade agreements to skew the teams on an AI village defense and we're not teaming up with them to do jack shit.  Closest thing we've come to that is our apparent alliance with the GFORCE crew, but I guess according to you guys that's going to break the game.

You guys are blowing your spergloads a little too early on this one, considering there isn't a single faction with 2 villages yet in NA.  The only battles we're seeing right now (and for the following couple of weeks, I imagine) are battles against AI villages with 200 population and the occasional small lightly armed field battles.

tl;dr calm down, strat 5 is only a week old

I think you are missing the point - its that none of you ever merc against each other ensuring all the ai villages being attacked by the 3 largest factions barely cost anything.  At least in Eu you have large factions sign up on othe side and make for good fights with the better gear the AI villages have thats unbroken and the benefits of being defender with ranged.  Most fights go 1:2 for attacker instead of this lame shit you guys are doing.

The small factions attacking NA fiefs still get plenty mercing against them so they are real fights, seems really lame and retarded that three largest factions refuse to merc against each other ever and strat has only just started and you are pulling this shit with it barely 2 weeks old.  Cowardly lame ass shit I was really hoping you guys would grow out of without wearing thin the excuse that you have to fight FCC.  Its boring, shit xp feeding each other villages for next to nothing.

Just look at the number of mercs on these rosters in these battles - the facts speak for themselves:

Small factions attacking villages:
http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive&view=list#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=79 (http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive&view=list#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=79)
http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive&view=list#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=92 (http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive&view=list#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=92)
http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive&view=list#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=100 (http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive&view=list#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=100)

Your 3 lame-ass fights tonight:
http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive&view=list#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=142 (http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive&view=list#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=142)
http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive&view=list#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=143 (http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive&view=list#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=143)
http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive&view=list#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=145 (http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive&view=list#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=145)


P.S.  Also, clueless - Gforce (basically chaos and some random guys) has taken 2 villages.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on February 25, 2014, 07:34:59 am
jesus christ kesh would you calm the fuck down you autismal man child holy fuck strat has been online for one week

Holy fuck some people. Get a grip dude god damn.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Keshian on February 25, 2014, 07:36:07 am
jesus christ kesh would you calm the fuck down you autismal man child holy fuck strat has been online for one week

Holy fuck some people. Get a grip dude god damn.

Best time to get it started right instead of starting off by making it stupid with no one mercing against you so all of us get shit xp.  Yes a lot of us want real fights not this cowardly bullshit.

Only been a week and a half and you start this fucking autistic man-child bullshit wrecking the fun of everyone else for your holy fucking e-peens.

Fucking holy some people.  Get the stick out of your asshole, god damn.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on February 25, 2014, 07:38:45 am
It has been one week of video games you daft cum breathing manchild, calm the hell down.


The reason there hasn't been any XP is cause no one wants to sign up for battles that will give them no XP regardless of the player amount and force them to use shitty gear on an uncoordinated team. Like holy fuck you are going WAY too hard in the autism dude.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on February 25, 2014, 07:40:01 am
I think you are missing the point - its that none of you ever merc against each other ensuring all the ai villages being attacked by the 3 largest factions barely cost anything.  At least in Eu you have large factions sign up on othe side and make for good fights with the better gear the AI villages have thats unbroken and the benefits of being defender with ranged.  Most fights go 1:2 for attacker instead of this lame shit you guys are doing.

The small factions attacking NA fiefs still get plenty mercing against them so they are real fights, seems really lame and retarded that three largest factions refuse to merc against each other ever and strat has only just started and you are pulling this shit with it barely 2 weeks old.  Cowardly lame ass shit I was really hoping you guys would grow out of without wearing thin the excuse that you have to fight FCC.  Its boring, shit xp feeding each other villages for next to nothing.

Just look at the number of mercs on these rosters in these battles - the facts speak for themselves:

Small factions attacking villages:
http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive&view=list#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=79 (http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive&view=list#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=79)
http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive&view=list#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=92 (http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive&view=list#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=92)
http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive&view=list#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=100 (http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive&view=list#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=100)

Your 3 lame-ass fights tonight:
http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive&view=list#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=142 (http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive&view=list#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=142)
http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive&view=list#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=143 (http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive&view=list#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=143)
http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive&view=list#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=145 (http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive&view=list#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=145)


P.S.  Also, clueless - Gforce (basically chaos and some random guys) has taken 2 villages.

DISCLAIMER: I AM MAKING THIS POST FOR MY OWN SATISFACTION

(click to show/hide)

(click to show/hide)

SUPER SECRET EDIT::::::
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Keshian on February 25, 2014, 07:41:03 am
It has been one week of video games you daft cum breathing manchild, calm the hell down.


The reason there hasn't been any XP is cause no one wants to sign up for battles that will give them no XP regardless of the player amount and force them to use shitty gear on an uncoordinated team. Like holy fuck you are going WAY too hard in the autism dude.

Wow you use bold print you must know what the fuck you are talking about you cum sucking daft piece of shit, calm the fuck down!

You do realize the AI has better gear than the attackers in most of these fights?  You dumb piece of shit - that excuse doesnt fly - otherwise you would see the same thing happen in all the small NA clan fights and all the EU fights - which is not the case - it only happens with your 3 large clans.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: betard_lulz on February 25, 2014, 07:42:38 am
(click to show/hide)
ty kesh. yes If the proof isnt in the pudding idk what then. Three battles from small factions and the whole world is against them. Three big circle jerk eurotrash factions and o look zero opposition.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on February 25, 2014, 07:43:14 am
That's it. I wasn't going to do this Kesh... I wasn't going to do it... but now I have to. You've really taken away all my choices. It might just be time to announce my Secret Services KGB.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: betard_lulz on February 25, 2014, 07:44:29 am
That's it. I wasn't going to do this Kesh... I wasn't going to do it... but now I have to. You've really taken away all my choices. It might just be time to announce my Secret pact that ive had with lco and gforce all along ive been found out.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Keshian on February 25, 2014, 07:44:49 am
I know I start being mean in how I say it - but my point is important and has solid evidence backing it.  I just get meaner when instead of trying to make it better you just try and put me or anyone else down who calls you out on your douchebaggery.


The best time to try to change it is now before it starts cascading where all the large factions just get to keep taking village after village barely losing any troops (I think occitan lost 50, fighting 45 v 15 when most small factions lose 300-400).  After a while you wont be able to fix it - so the only time to change is now at the beginning of strat.  Make it fun for everyone instead of a circlejerk.  take a chance this strat - step out of your comfort zone. 

Be a man and start standing out of the crowd - maybe you will get reviled and called puutie backstabbing scum, but fuck at least you are a man instead of some cowardly dumb follower scared at losing a stupid pixel game.  I know hospitallers had to deal with this shit for actually changing their diplomacy this strat, but fuck a lot of people respect that shit a lot more than people who win by gay circle-jerking before strat even really gets going.

And yes its very important to address all this shit now before it cascades - all the largest factions are going to geta  dozen free villages this way otherwise and make it a far less dynamic and enjoyable game for everyone including themselves in the long run even if they "win".
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: betard_lulz on February 25, 2014, 07:46:46 am
Don't worry kesh the whole name calling thing instead of attacking the post itself is known as ad hominem and the goblin, sandy vag, and all his other friends are real good at it.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: betard_lulz on February 25, 2014, 08:01:09 am
(click to show/hide)
Post all the memes yall want.

-An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument-

SUCH AS....
jesus christ kesh would you calm the fuck down you autismal man child

Anyways my fellow forum viewers all I ask is for you to consider this. LCO may say that their past enemies enjoy the neutrality. Goblin may say calm [profanity] [profanity] [profanity] down. I say: No one ever lies on the internet.

Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on February 25, 2014, 08:05:57 am
I AM SO MAD THAT YOUR GROUP OF STRATEGUS FRIENDS IS BIGGER THAN MINE OMG

I AM SO MAD THAT YOUR GROUP OF STRATEGUS FRIENDS IS BIGGER THAN MINE OMG

"It's not ad hominem when the people you're insulting are actually retarded." - Kurt Vonnegut
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: betard_lulz on February 25, 2014, 08:06:57 am
(click to show/hide)

Well that last bit is essentially the spirit of all your shit posts. I'm sorry to have offended the establishment goblin. Fuck off.
Also this pretty much proves my point about lco gforce and lco being the same thing and running trade simulator 2015. enjoy :D
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on February 25, 2014, 08:26:49 am
Has no one considered that maybe the m8s, occitan, and GOBBLINS (please start including Hospitaller and Acre in the list of large factions) really just want to get some fiefs in their hands and some revenue (so that we can get to at least like 25 body armor and falchions and shit in battles) instead of fighting stupid peasant battles one week into the game? Like why is that such a hard idea to get into your head instead of being a contrarian jizz sock screaming about how nerds aren't signing up against their friends to fight in -2 one gold armor?

Keshian you just don't understand that people aren't signing up against each other because they don't have such furious stances about this as you. We aren't such hardcore nerds that we shit ourselves when people don't play against random factions in 200 ticket defences. That's the core difference between us and you. Most of us just see peasant battles and go "eh, fuck thats a waste of time, I'm not playing that". It's not that we have any type of agreement at all stopping us from playing for each other, except maybe just mutual understanding that none of us (the people actually taking fiefs) really wants to be playing these shitty peasant battles. When we actually have the ability to fight fun battles we will start attacking each other.

Oh, and the following numbers are from following the Strategus IDs of the larger factions on Strat to see their actual number of members:

Occitan - 30 members
The M8s - 28 members
Acre - 28 members
Hospitaller - 25 members
The GOBBLIN Empire - 24 members

I know that several of these factions are going to war against each other, or against other factions slightly smaller. Some have asked me for help to attack other factions. In some cases 2 factions have each asked me to attack the other. The party lines are much less designed and finalized than you think. You just have an outsiders view because for the first time the people in control of the greatest amount of players all don't really talk to you.

You're being obtuse... is it deliberate?
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Goretooth on February 25, 2014, 08:48:51 am
Has no one considered that maybe the m8s, occitan, and GOBBLINS (please start including Hospitaller and Acre in the list of large factions) really just want to get some fiefs in their hands and some revenue (so that we can get to at least like 25 body armor and falchions and shit in battles) instead of fighting stupid peasant battles one week into the game? Like why is that such a hard idea to get into your head instead of being a contrarian jizz sock screaming about how nerds aren't signing up against their friends to fight in -2 one gold armor?

Keshian you just don't understand that people aren't signing up against each other because they don't have such furious stances about this as you. We aren't such hardcore nerds that we shit ourselves when people don't play against random factions in 200 ticket defences. That's the core difference between us and you. Most of us just see peasant battles and go "eh, fuck thats a waste of time, I'm not playing that". It's not that we have any type of agreement at all stopping us from playing for each other, except maybe just mutual understanding that none of us (the people actually taking fiefs) really wants to be playing these shitty peasant battles. When we actually have the ability to fight fun battles we will start attacking each other.

Oh, and the following numbers are from following the Strategus IDs of the larger factions on Strat to see their actual number of members:

Occitan - 30 members
The M8s - 28 members
Acre - 28 members
Hospitaller - 25 members
The GOBBLIN Empire - 24 members

I know that several of these factions are going to war against each other, or against other factions slightly smaller. Some have asked me for help to attack other factions. In some cases 2 factions have each asked me to attack the other. The party lines are much less designed and finalized than you think. You just have an outsiders view because for the first time the people in control of the greatest amount of players all don't really talk to you.

You're being obtuse... is it deliberate?
nerd or canary and where fuck is the swearing?
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Artyem on February 25, 2014, 08:59:43 am
I'm going to guess that round 4 left some people with permanent brain damage and that's why they're all shitting bricks over 400 vs 200 AI village battles.

should clarify that I'm making this statement because even the EU nerds are doing it
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: IR_Kuoin on February 25, 2014, 09:08:19 am
Why can't everyone just have no alliances and just go balls ?
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Canary on February 25, 2014, 11:03:48 am
ON THE OTHER HAND, it's looking a hell of a lot better than the start of strat 3; thanks in part to the pseudonym system I imagine.

I recall the record low amount of players signing up for the neutral fiefs against Chaos back then was four, two of whom were no-shows.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Butan on February 25, 2014, 01:55:44 pm
(click to show/hide)


Is every debate like this on NA?

A guy complain and use arguments,
Everyone accused nerdily make the same joke about autism and bundle of sticksry on 5 pages,

I think you are all being autist : Kesh for trying to convince those accused, and the accused for trying to look cool and relaxed about it.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: BaleOhay on February 25, 2014, 02:53:15 pm
Posts fine in a reasonable manner seen to be generally ignored. Kesh's style is more in line with the way they post. No one wins anyone over on either side really.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Chosen1 on February 25, 2014, 03:04:23 pm
This has just become another kesh bashing thread lol
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: HardRice on February 25, 2014, 03:19:37 pm
The fuck is wrong with all of you?
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: MURDERTRON on February 25, 2014, 03:32:11 pm
Why can't everyone just have no alliances and just go balls ?

Because you need full rosters.

Also Kesh is gay.  Am I doing this right?
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: imisshotmail on February 25, 2014, 03:51:13 pm
(click to show/hide)


Is every debate like this on NA?

A guy complain and use arguments,
Everyone accused nerdily make the same joke about autism and bundle of sticksry on 5 pages,

I think you are all being autist : Kesh for trying to convince those accused, and the accused for trying to look cool and relaxed about it.

You are literally as bad as Kesh with your threads about UIF. All you shitty europeans and kesh should group up, because you both have some delusional vendetta against *"ALLIANCES"* in a fucking war game.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: HardRice on February 25, 2014, 05:22:28 pm
You are literally as bad as Kesh with your threads about UIF. All you shitty europeans and kesh should group up, because you both have some delusional vendetta against *"ALLIANCES"* in a fucking war game.
It's not about clans allying with other clans, people get pissed when  2 or more very powerful clans join up in an alliance for four fucking strategus rounds and dominate all the rest.

Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Elindor on February 25, 2014, 05:51:50 pm
My faction made significantly more battles, more XP, and more fun than any of the things you've ever contributed to, you assmunching shit baby.

All people recognize you as is that one retard that occasionally makes really bad threads thinking that he's trolling people. Go back to /b/ you jizz sock of a player.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Haramir on February 25, 2014, 05:52:56 pm
So many clans and players decided not to get involved full time this round of strategus  that its easy to understand why there isnt much opposition for the IA fief.

FCC is not really there, at least not the big organization it was last round, HOC are gone or almost, Kutt said they would maybe get involved, TkOV dont have the 60 members they use to have, FIDLGB and chaos are lossely affiliated some keep on playing strategus. raven wont get involved as a clan. MB i dont really know

While chevalier have more members than last strat, Occitan is barely having 15-20 members and we lost a lot of really active players. Im sure the same can be said for a lot of clan that are still playing.


So for the rest of you complaining about Gobblins, LCO and any other clan struggling to play this round of strat

Fuck you all, i dont want to ear you on the forum crying each time a clan get flag capped because of lost XP.
Strat is a war game the point is to beat the enemy not making sure ppl who dont get involved in strat get Their 1 million XP each night they decide they want to play
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: betard_lulz on February 25, 2014, 06:08:00 pm
I'm not crying about flag caps. I am saying tho that beating your enemy through carebear alliances and having a super friends coalition to hand over fiefs to you and at the same time signing 80 deep against anyone who hasnt given you a reach around lately is quite lame.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: StonedSteel on February 25, 2014, 06:14:29 pm
pfff

its looking like strat 5 is gonna be a fucking joke
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Relit on February 25, 2014, 06:24:59 pm
pfff

its looking like strat 5 is gonna be a fucking joke

I'm just guessing here but there should be a few good wars and probably much more organized/arranged battles between friendly factions. Similar to what MURDERTRON was doing last strat. I see the appeal of arranged battles... less stress on the part of either faction and a more friendly atmosphere.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Keshian on February 25, 2014, 06:28:42 pm
pfff

its looking like strat 5 is gonna be a fucking joke

Sums it up beautifully.  I was really hoping the toolbags would be different, but if anything its worse since they started this shit from day 1 even without an FCC to fight.


P.S. Daruvian every village has unbroken and better gear (nomad bows +0, battle axes +0, nomad robes +0, etc.) than attackers not worse and attackers are getting 40+ rosters, the reverse of what you are arguing.  If you were real enemies you would hurt them in the defenses making them lose hundreds of troops so they cant immediately take another village and then another because they only lost 50-100 troops instead of 350 and all the gear used.  Only Hopsitallers are signing up as a faction for AI against large factions, except when its a small faction attacking a village then suddenly you and all your buddies actually do sign for AI, which nullifies your entire argument for why you are not signing for AI. 

But then again you and your ex-CC buddies are just going to resort to name calling because there is no way in hell you would admit to this.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on February 25, 2014, 07:23:05 pm
Kesh, you're drawing lines between things that aren't connected because you think you understand people and you just don't. You're being the fucking Glenn Beck of cRPG screaming so hard at your chalkboard with pictures and chalk lines and words like CAREBEAR and MEGA-ALLIANCE written in all caps that you break down and cry on-air.

People sign up against Hospitaller cause they don't like them. It's that simple, captain tinfoil. People play this game differently than you. We don't give a shyit about stopping every village attack. Even if there were some sort of temporary mega-alliance, I don't think ninety percent of players would give a shit because it means less shitty peasant fights and quicker scaling up to large armed battles with good XP. It's only the 10% of people that are so into this game that they would sacrifice their cock for a Masterwork that give a shit.

So what you have to see here is, the majority of people you are complaining about don't give a shit. I know I don't. Do you want to try and explain to me why my friends and I should stop working together in video games to our own benefit and humor because some near-universally disliked megasperg who has no idea of the diplomacy between factions one week into Strat says so while frothing at the mouth calling a hundred people douchebags?
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Keshian on February 25, 2014, 07:39:11 pm
Except you guys are signing against all the small factions not just hospitallers and not against the 3 large factions, which is exactly what you are denying.  You got caught in a lie so instead of admitting it you dig yourself deeper by trying to put the people calling you out on your lie names and saying you don't really care (except you respond more than any other poster other than me).  Your "i don't care shit" doesnt match up"  if it did everyone would be getting easy villages to take not just the 3 largest factions who were allied all last strat too. 

Just look at Eu and there are tons of great fights and AI wins a decent amount of the time.  But you guys are nerd-sperging over a pixel game, scared of losing, and gayed up strat from the beginning.  Usually it takes a few months before this gay shit happens - kind of sad how badly you guys want to win.

Fucking be original.  God you are tedious.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: MURDERTRON on February 25, 2014, 07:43:52 pm
Except you guys are signing against all the small factions not just hospitallers and not against the 3 large factions, which is exactly what you are denying.  You got caught in a lie so instead of admitting it you dig yourself deeper by trying to put the people calling you out on your lie names and saying you don't really care (except you respond more than any other poster other than me).  Your "i don't care shit" doesnt match up"  if it did everyone would be getting easy villages to take not just the 3 largest factions who were allied all last strat too.

Fucking be original.  God you are tedious.

Kesh, Gforce is a new clan this Strat and Gobblins were a fairly new clan towards the end of last strat.  Who is the third clan?
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on February 25, 2014, 07:44:38 pm
Stop Murder, Kesh can't be reasoned with.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: imisshotmail on February 25, 2014, 07:44:42 pm
I'll spell it out for you Kesh here-

There are people who play this game and like each other as people, not just for c-RPG related things (a hard to understand concept for you I know).
Then there are people who are unliked not just because of c-RPG things, but because they are awful people, point in case you.

Hospitaller are a clan of people massively disliked, people sign up against them because they don't like them as people, they are awful.
People sign up for (or don't sign up against) clans like Occitan because they are full of cool people.

Just because people don't want to put their personal opinions aside for Fucking AI Fiefs does not mean they are all allied together, get a grip.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Keshian on February 25, 2014, 07:48:43 pm
Kesh, Gforce is a new clan this Strat and Gobblins were a fairly new clan towards the end of last strat.  Who is the third clan?

Gforce was around last strat and now consists of many of its members being made up of a huge chunck of chaos members who were gobblin vassals last strat.  Gobblins had been around for months before the end of strat and consisted of FUPA, Chaos, and others and had "vassalized" astralis, Occitan, and others - all clans around for quite a while.  Occitan was also around at that time as the other large faction.  Not one of these 3 factions merc against each other in the AI fights but are mercing in many of the other ai fights where the 3 largest factions are not involved.  Since then a lot of central confederacy has joined gobblins. 

Basically the big gay alliance last strat of Gobblins, Central Confederacy, Occitan, and chaos (many of whom share and continue to share the same ts) just got carried over into next strat to make this as shitty as EU was last strat.  The problem is with no FCC to counter this gayness it just leaves a huge boring thing where these spergs fight only the small factions while making up 60% or more of the playerbase - wrecking everyone's fun because so desperate to win a stupid pixel game.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on February 25, 2014, 07:52:27 pm
I mean, Kesh REALLY can't be reasoned with. I even showed him that my faction is like the fifth largest, and that two factions he is TOTALLY IGNORING WHEN HE DISCUSSES THIS are actually in the top four largest factions: Hospitaller and Acre. Acre may quickly even become the largest faction. All they would have to do is get three members to put them over Occitan... but Kesh ignores this.

Honestly, what hotmail said is right as far as I can see.

Oh, and saying "I don't care" doesn't mean I'm not going to try and get to the core of what you're saying and try to argue otherwise. It just means that in all practicality, in terms of actual change on Strategus or with my friends, that nothing you have said has convinced me to do anything other than what I am already doing.

Oh, and I can't recall a single Chaos member in my faction last Strategus you shitbag. Do you not remember us launching like 5 battles against Chaos because they wouldn't admit vassalship?

Honestly, I think Kesh just doesn't understand friendship. Someone get this man a Berenstain Bears book or something.

EDIT: Something else you're really forgetting is that my faction is totally voluntary and even though I name myself nerdy shit like KING and EMPEROR, I try to never tell anyone in my faction to do something they don't want to do.

I.E. I don't tell my people who to sign up for if they want to play for the other side. It's all voluntary. The consequences of this are that I'm not telling any of my players to sign up or not sign up for AI defenses. They do it of their own volition based off their likes/dislikes of the attacker.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Keshian on February 25, 2014, 07:57:27 pm
I mean, Kesh REALLY can't be reasoned with. I even showed him that my faction is like the fifth largest, and that two factions he is TOTALLY IGNORING WHEN HE DISCUSSES THIS are actually in the top four largest factions: Hospitaller and Acre. Acre may quickly even become the largest faction. All they would have to do is get three members to put them over Occitan... but Kesh ignores this.

Honestly, what hotmail said is right as far as I can see.

Oh, and saying "I don't care" doesn't mean I'm not going to try and get to the core of what you're saying and try to argue otherwise. It just means that in all practicality, in terms of actual change on Strategus or with my friends, that nothing you have said has convinced me to do anything other than what I am already doing.

Oh, and I can't recall a single Chaos member in my faction last Strategus you shitbag. Do you not remember us launching like 5 battles against Chaos because they wouldn't admit vassalship?

Honestly, I think Kesh just doesn't understand friendship. Someone get this man a Berenstain Bears book or something.

You don't remember that clan, forget their name for the moment (Apple...?), that with FUPA helped form gobblins - Krosis, that dumb kid who always is desperate to be heard in ts...Mcsomething or other, Malaclypse_of_chaos, xol_of_chaos, and a couple others.  then after 1 fight canary and all chaos vassalized themselves to gobblins and helped them in their fights.  Friendship is great man - but doing gay alliances with most of the map from day 1 to beat up the stupid ai is just sad.  Really Sad!
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on February 25, 2014, 07:59:41 pm
Except it's not sad. It just makes a quicker game progression to the type of game we want to play. It's not so that we all ally and get together 3 months and shit on the rest of the map. It's so that in 2 months we will actually be capable of having battles that we think are fun... and no amount of your whinging is going to convince us that trying to pursue our idea of fun is the wrong thing to do.

Oh, and Krosis wasn't really a Chaos member. Golden Apple Corps and Chaos were two separate things. Mala was never in GOBBLINS. Neither was Xol.

We have no alliances. The only declared diplomacy we have is that the Gforce Mafia is our "spergprotectorate" because I think they're hilarious and don't want to see them wiped off the map. That's it.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Canary on February 25, 2014, 08:00:51 pm
Gforce was around last strat and now consists of many of its members being made up of a huge chunck of chaos members who were gobblin vassals last strat.

LOL

Gobblins had been around for months before the end of strat and consisted of FUPA, Chaos, and others and had "vassalized" astralis, Occitan, and others - all clans around for quite a while.  Occitan was also around at that time as the other large faction.  Not one of these 3 factions merc against each other in the AI fights but are mercing in many of the other ai fights where the 3 largest factions are not involved.

Maybe the people who are already at war are interested in trying to keep things parallel and don't want to rock the boat against other uninvolved large factions over something stupid when people are still in the process of drawing their fiefs from the neutral pool. What we have now is people unconcerned with defending the neutral villages against factions who are going to take them whether people are signed up or not. It may be unfortunate that the biggest factions don't see heavier ticket losses while staking their claims, but I think connecting dots and reading into what people are going to do this early on is moot.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: betard_lulz on February 25, 2014, 08:01:50 pm
Terribly sorry gobblecocks but if you want to kill AI so quickly then why merc against hosp and any of these other smaller factions?
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: imisshotmail on February 25, 2014, 08:04:01 pm
THEYRE AT WAR WITH HOSPITALLERS
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Keshian on February 25, 2014, 08:04:10 pm
Except it's not sad. It just makes a quicker game progression to the type of game we want to play. It's not so that we all ally and get together 3 months and shit on the rest of the map. It's so that in 2 months we will actually be capable of having battles that we think are fun... and no amount of your whinging is going to convince us that trying to pursue our idea of fun is the wrong thing to do.

I would agree with that if it wasnt exclusively for these 3 largest factions and it causes a cascade - if you don't lose troops taking ai village you get to take another and then another and then another so only 3 large factions really get to play killing off smaller factions making the game stale and boring - yes, even for these large factions who have no one to fight since they wont fight each other.  Its exactly the stupid shit that happened in EU and made it boring months before NA got stale and really hope we don't get stuck with that in NA - but you are working well on track to do that.

Maybe the people who are already at war are interested in trying to keep things parallel and don't want to rock the boat against other uninvolved large factions over something stupid when people are still in the process of drawing their fiefs from the neutral pool. What we have now is people unconcerned with defending the neutral villages against factions who are going to take them whether people are signed up or not. It may be unfortunate that the biggest factions don't see heavier ticket losses while staking their claims, but I think connecting dots and reading into what people are going to do this early on is moot.

The funny thing is Chaos was one of the worst abusers of this stupidity in strat 3 - where if you signed up against them it was like some kind of act of war with 50 v 7, while everybody else was having real fights against the ai villages.  With the anonymous feature we shouldn't be having this, but sadly banners still show up.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: betard_lulz on February 25, 2014, 08:05:53 pm
THEYRE AT WAR WITH HOSPITALLERS
IF IT WERE JUST HOSP THATD BE COOL BUT IT REALLY ISNT IF YOU INSIST ILL GO AND GET SCREENCAPS
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on February 25, 2014, 08:06:21 pm
Because I think inconveniencing Hospitaller is really funny because they are very emotionally reactive to video games as demonstrated by Gforce Mafia's recent video. I will get personal pleasure out of it knowing that they might get upset.

Kesh still hasn't mentioned Acre in this. You know I'm friends with James right? And that I signed up for Acre on their attack? Surely Acre is just another part of this mega-alliance right, you daft douche? Surely Acre, Occitan, The M8S, the GOBBLINS, and the Gforce Mafia are all in a coalition to get each other every fief and then become the French GOBBLIN M8s Mafia of Acre.

You are convincing me that you are literally autistic.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Keshian on February 25, 2014, 08:10:03 pm


You are convincing me that you are literally autistic.

Exactly what I was thinking of you - how many times do you have to make weak arguments backed by insults and no real evidence like some of us have posted showing the battle rosters before you look in the mirror and see your own autism daruvian.  Great - you have a bunch of spergy friends on the internet coming from that lame ass gaming group that live to troll and wreck games, you must be right.

You win the autistic race! Congrats!  3 stars for you! I give up - I'm going to work.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Shik on February 25, 2014, 08:10:49 pm
lmao
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: MURDERTRON on February 25, 2014, 08:12:22 pm
I'll spell it out for you Kesh here-

There are people who play this game and like each other as people, not just for c-RPG related things (a hard to understand concept for you I know).
Then there are people who are unliked not just because of c-RPG things, but because they are awful people, point in case you.

Hospitaller are a clan of people massively disliked, people sign up against them because they don't like them as people, they are awful.
People sign up for (or don't sign up against) clans like Occitan because they are full of cool people.

Just because people don't want to put their personal opinions aside for Fucking AI Fiefs does not mean they are all allied together, get a grip.

I'm not sure if Occitan are cool people, but since I can't understand them most of the time, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on February 25, 2014, 08:14:03 pm
Incoming announcement for the sake of the community, stand by.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: MURDERTRON on February 25, 2014, 08:18:33 pm
Kesh, Gforce was one guy who made some funny posts about Remnant.  I happened to see him on the strat map, unarmed and he had not even recruited a single troop.  I took him out, but I think it's safe to say that they did not participate in Strat 4.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on February 25, 2014, 08:28:46 pm
In my infinite KINGLY wisdom I have seen only one solution to solve the issue this thread has presented us with, in order to create a better society:

http://forum.melee.org/diplomacy/the-gobblin-empire-announces-new-kgb-task-force/
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Canary on February 25, 2014, 08:29:24 pm
I would agree with that if it wasnt exclusively for these 3 largest factions and it causes a cascade - if you don't lose troops taking ai village you get to take another and then another and then another so only 3 large factions really get to play killing off smaller factions making the game stale and boring - yes, even for these large factions who have no one to fight since they wont fight each other.  Its exactly the stupid shit that happened in EU and made it boring months before NA got stale and really hope we don't get stuck with that in NA - but you are working well on track to do that.

If that's the case why don't you try to advocate people not signing up against small clans, if that's where your interests really lie. Either way you slice it they're going to be behind on resources no matter who's signing/not signing up for whomever.

The funny thing is Chaos was one of the worst abusers of this stupidity in strat 3 - where if you signed up against them it was like some kind of act of war with 50 v 7, while everybody else was having real fights against the ai villages.  With the anonymous feature we shouldn't be having this, but sadly banners still show up.

You are literally making the dumbest assumptions. We were really, really disappointed that nobody signed up against us in those battles. For fuck's sake, we broke a truce (http://pastebin.com/beL0h611) we made with Hospitaller later that same strat by 10~ of us signing up to defend some castle simply because we didn't feel it was fair that they were going to get thousands of tickets because nobody signs up for neutral castles.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Artyem on February 25, 2014, 08:36:32 pm
Kesh has become cRPG's very own version of Alex Jones.  Look out for the strategus illuminati, the dangerous shadow government controlling the GOBBLIN LCO Acre GFORCE M8 alliance.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: imisshotmail on February 25, 2014, 08:39:48 pm
Kesh has become cRPG's very own version of Alex Jones.  Look out for the strategus illuminati, the dangerous shadow government controlling the GOBBLIN LCO Acre GFORCE M8 alliance.



Replace Obama with Daruvian.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: BaleOhay on February 25, 2014, 09:11:32 pm
I will withhold judgement but I am willing to Bet a beer three months into this round none of those groups kesh names will fight each other. I would not be surprised if they same can be said for the entire round. I honestly hope I am wrong because I would like to fight for some different factions this round
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Lt_Anders on February 25, 2014, 09:56:39 pm
Good thing my current faction is ignored! We got like...15 members and gobblins are jerks. Jacked are coolest member. FUCK YOU GOBBLINS.  :lol:
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Keshian on February 25, 2014, 11:04:53 pm
I will withhold judgement but I am willing to Bet a beer three months into this round none of those groups kesh names will fight each other. I would not be surprised if they same can be said for the entire round. I honestly hope I am wrong because I would like to fight for some different factions this round

I'm going to remember this and post this 3 months from now when it comes true and Gforce, Gobblins, Mates, and Occitan never once fight each other. (By the way thats 4 of the 5 largest clans you listed Daruvian)

In my infinite KINGLY wisdom I have seen only one solution to solve the issue this thread has presented us with, in order to create a better society:


You DEFINITELY beat me in the autistic nerd race! *single hand clapping*  Let me be one of the first to sign up.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Tomas on February 26, 2014, 12:10:08 am
All this was exactly why AI fiefs were taken out of the game in Strat 4.  Its just a pity that people's short memories and rose tinted spectacles have led to them being added back in, making this strat largely pointless imo.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Lt_Anders on February 26, 2014, 12:21:59 am
I bet NA doesn't even cap all AI fiefs before the end of strat. :lol:
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: HarryCrumb on February 26, 2014, 07:30:01 pm
Sorry would "largest chunck of ravens and dracul going to any one faction" make you happy.

#GOTHEEEEEEEEEM (see my sig for more info on relit)
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: imisshotmail on February 26, 2014, 07:41:05 pm
All this was exactly why AI fiefs were taken out of the game in Strat 4.  Its just a pity that people's short memories and rose tinted spectacles have led to them being added back in, making this strat largely pointless imo.

I like the AI fiefs for Castles and Cities, when people have those from the start lots of wars are stale and drawn out since they are so hard to attack. Plus it adds a sense of progression to capturing those AI fiefs as Strategus goes on.
I do feel like the villages though are terrible though when they are AI, it's a fact that when someone attacks them with 300+ troops the attackers are pretty much always going to win, it just adds some needless "pre-game" before actual stuff starts.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Canary on February 27, 2014, 02:47:34 am
OH MY GOD (http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=178) IT'S NOT JUST (http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesupcoming#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=179) THOSE THREE CLANS KESH CALLED OUT BECAUSE OF HIS PERSONAL INTERESTS!


Is everyone allied?!?!
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Keshian on February 27, 2014, 02:50:56 am
OH MY GOD (http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=178) IT'S NOT JUST (http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesupcoming#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=179) THOSE THREE CLANS KESH CALLED OUT BECAUSE OF HIS PERSONAL INTERESTS!


Thank god we have such an impartial person chosen to be the head NA admin.  Everyone knows how reliable and neutral you are in your decisions.  You are doing an awesome job!

Also, if you had been in Acre ts you would have heard me asking them to sign up against other factions AI fief battles so that more people would sign up against acre in retaliation for fun battles for the community. 

P.S.  We probably would have beat 350 man frisian army (which most ai villages have been doing in EU) if it had been more even than 32 v 12 - we were doing almost a 2:1 with the better gear the AI has) http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=179 (http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=179)

P.P.S.  Artyem it just comes across as lame - do you even play crpg anymore?
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Artyem on February 27, 2014, 02:52:39 am
Thank god we have such an impartial person chosen to be the head NA admin.  Everyone knows how reliable and neutral you are in your decisions.  You are doing an awesome job!

Good arguing, Kesh, you're a truly professional debater.


OH MY GOD (http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=178) IT'S NOT JUST (http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesupcoming#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=179) THOSE THREE CLANS KESH CALLED OUT BECAUSE OF HIS PERSONAL INTERESTS!

secret shadow alliances, I bet every faction with 20+ members is in on it.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Canary on February 27, 2014, 03:14:37 am
Thank god we have such an impartial person chosen to be the head NA admin.  Everyone knows how reliable and neutral you are in your decisions.  You are doing an awesome job!

If not readily accepting your crackpot theories is biased, then I haven't been playing the game long enough. Oh well, at least you changed the subject onto me instead.

Also, if you had been in Acre ts you would have heard me asking them to sign up against other factions AI fief battles so that more people would sign up against acre in retaliation for fun battles for the community. 

So what you're saying is that you were signed up for a faction that wasn't your own, cementing your everlasting alliance with them and furthering the gap between large and small factions by helping them beat the AI?
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Keshian on February 27, 2014, 03:29:01 am
If not readily accepting your crackpot theories is biased, then I haven't been playing the game long enough. Oh well, at least you changed the subject onto me instead.


I didn't say you needed to agree with me.  All I said was you are obviously impartial head admin with how often you shove your page long opinions onto the forums and moderate at such a "professional, impartial" way. 

Basically learn to stay neutral and keep your mouth shut if you actually want to be believable as doing a good job as head admin.

The rest of us are not trying to act as essentially judge, jury and executioner for everyone else so we can say what we like, but you are placed in a position of authority (however poor that choice was) and should act accordingly.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on February 27, 2014, 03:35:49 am
I didn't say you needed to agree with me.  All I said was you are obviously impartial head admin with how often you shove your page long opinions onto the forums and moderate at such a "professional, impartial" way. 

Basically learn to stay neutral and keep your mouth shut if you actually want to be believable as doing a good job as head admin.

The rest of us are not trying to act as essentially judge, jury and executioner for everyone else so we can say what we like, but you are placed in a position of authority (however poor that choice was) and should act accordingly.

lol
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Artyem on February 27, 2014, 04:04:43 am
Nope, I definitely don't play cRPG anymore.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Rhalzo on February 27, 2014, 05:14:26 am
Thank god we have such an impartial person chosen to be the head NA admin.  Everyone knows how reliable and neutral you are in your decisions.  You are doing an awesome job!

You're not supposed to use that type of statement sarcastically, Kesh. Tisk tisk.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: HarryCrumb on February 27, 2014, 07:35:52 am
P.P.S.  Artyem it just comes across as lame - do you even play crpg anymore?
#realtalk #fkdracul
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Tears of Destiny on February 27, 2014, 08:54:40 am
Thank god we have such an impartial person chosen to be the head NA admin.  Everyone knows how reliable and neutral you are in your decisions.  You are doing an awesome job!
Leagues better then Shik, say what you will, let the downvotes commence... Let it rain, let it rain, let it rain...
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Rikthor on February 27, 2014, 06:09:30 pm
Leagues better then Shik, say what you will, let the downvotes commence... Let it rain, let it rain, let it rain...

Shik is at least funny
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: dreadnok on February 27, 2014, 06:18:49 pm
Gobblins are shitty baddies and need to crutch on a EU backed mega alliance

Little do you baddie nerdy butt-faces realize that your gobblin horde is actually crutching on the player bases of clans funded entirely by EU super conglomerates. You think you've got it all figured out? You'll win it all? You baddie faces will capture the whole of NA, yeah, only to have your "allies" stab you in the cooch and turn it all around on you. And the gobblin banner will be torn down, replaced by the hammer and sickle of[size=24ptw] the EU hordes[/size].

First the Maine, now this. When will we learn, I ask you all?


No clue what the fuck was said or conveyed but it was mindbending, and on a side note mesh, its hard to switch sides from people you play with. You call out daruvian yet sandy is a hell of a fucking leader in these battles. Daruvian just yells at people  when he team wounds them. I been in other battles that were clusterfucks because of leadership, I think I'll stick with sandy
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: StonedSteel on February 27, 2014, 08:22:33 pm
k...ive read all this shit, i have friends in every camp so im not biased for one bundle of sticks over another...but honestly...this strat is gonna be gayer then aids

maybe if the faction actually had enough active members to make full rosters out of their OWN players, sadly NA has a whooping pop of 100 fucking people, so clan alliances are bound to happens. And no i dont agree just cuz its a war game there SHOULD be alliances...pfff imo it would be a lot better war game if clans were out for themselves trying to prove which was the best clan at war.

And by that i mean which was the best AT WARFARE...sadly this war game has some bad mechanics that make afk traders with powerful friends seem like conquerors

Imo...Kesh is right, hate me if u will i dont fucking care, its the honest truth.

Months from now when small independent factions are still struggling along, the super-alliances will easily have a shit ton more resources as ever village they attack right now is a guaranteed win, since no one will sign against them, whereas the independents have people actually trying to keep them from gaining a fief thus more power

In the end, very few fights will prob go down, the supers wont fight against eachother....so there is nothing to stop them from taking over the map.... lol taking over the map to do what? the independents with maybe a village or two and small resources...they wont stand a chance attacking , they wont stand a chance defending

They wont have the gear, they wont have the resources, and even if they did, they dont have the rosters, PLUS, since their enemies are all allied, they wont have much of a break is someone attacks them...vs a mega alliance where even if u are attacked, another part of your grand alliance comes to ur aid and takes the weight of ur back.


and then when all the inde's are wiped, and the only ones left are the super alliance...pff they will prob just quit, saying they won the game and moved on....pffff u dont win shit when there is no chance of losing anything lol


i dont know Hosp all that well, admittingly they are the clan i have fewest friends in, and the least amount of time spent in TS

but ill be damned if i dont admire them right now, i like how they play the game, i like how they try to win, and i respect them when they lose

cheers to u Hos...its gonna be u vs the fucking world this strat...may the best clan \ super cant be beat alliance win



i said it looked like strat 5 would be a joke...let me rephrase

shamefully disgusting and fucking disgraceful...war game my ass, tis more like a popularity contest
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Keshian on February 27, 2014, 08:38:27 pm
war game my ass, tis more like a popularity contest

I'm adding that to my sig - great phrasing covering all of strat 5 and the mentality of all the trade simulator clans.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on February 27, 2014, 09:02:54 pm
Every person seems to be forgetting that last Strategus the path to great warfare and fun times in NA was based off of huge alliance v. huge alliance. The most fun conflicts were things like TKoV V. Occitan, FCC V. Hospitaller, et cetera.

I also don't understand how people have enough video game amnesia to forget that just four or five months ago I led just about the only fucking active Strategus faction, one I pulled from thin air, while the people posting in this thread about how this Strategus will be shit because of AFK mega-factions were doing roughly the following:

Keshian -- Inactive leader of the largest or second largest Strat faction, which made no offensive maneuvers for months.
Betard -- Inactive member of the third or fourth largest Strat faction, which made no offensive maneuvers for months and was so cripplingly inactive with its hordes of resources that it got destroyed by Occitan in just like a week.
Plumbo -- Member of HoC, the faction whos only interaction with the rest of the map was my faction sending attacks on them while they inactively camped Almerra with over ten thousand troops. Were in a mega-alliance with TKoV/MB for most of the Strat.

None of you seem like the greatest representatives to be speaking on the matter. I know you're all just making inaccurate third party speculation because I myself have still not decided exactly what to do with my faction. I could do anything. I know I certainly haven't put together this faction for it to AFK somewhere.

Honestly, I don't get how nobody is calling Keshian out for being a hypocrite. Four months of no Strategus shouldn't be enough for everyone to forget that Keshian was pragmatically in control of or the representative of the largest super power on the map for the greatest amount of time. The person who is just months later telling us that having two 20-man factions ally is absolutely disgusting behavior is coming from the person who last Strategus abused new clans into feeding him troops time and time again (SKoT, GoW, Acre, Berserks), and creating the mega bloc of FCC which was at least as large as any alliance he is accusing of going on now.

EDIT: Someone tell me I have autism for making this post on my day off.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: StonedSteel on February 27, 2014, 09:21:31 pm
Every person seems to be forgetting that last Strategus the path to great warfare and fun times in NA was based off of huge alliance v. huge alliance. The most fun conflicts were things like TKoV V. Occitan, FCC V. Hospitaller, et cetera.

I also don't understand how people have enough video game amnesia to forget that just four or five months ago I led just about the only fucking active Strategus faction, one I pulled from thin air, while the people posting in this thread about how this Strategus will be shit because of AFK mega-factions were doing roughly the following:

Keshian -- Inactive leader of the largest or second largest Strat faction, which made no offensive maneuvers for months.
Betard -- Inactive member of the third or fourth largest Strat faction, which made no offensive maneuvers for months and was so cripplingly inactive with its hordes of resources that it got destroyed by Occitan in just like a week.
Plumbo -- Member of HoC, the faction whos only interaction with the rest of the map was my faction sending attacks on them while they inactively camped Almerra with over ten thousand troops. Were in a mega-alliance with TKoV/MB for most of the Strat.

None of you seem like the greatest representatives to be speaking on the matter. I know you're all just making inaccurate third party speculation because I myself have still not decided exactly what to do with my faction. I could do anything. I know I certainly haven't put together this faction for it to AFK somewhere.

Honestly, I don't get how nobody is calling Keshian out for being a hypocrite. Four months of no Strategus shouldn't be enough for everyone to forget that Keshian was pragmatically in control of or the representative of the largest super power on the map for the greatest amount of time. The person who is just months later telling us that having two 20-man factions ally is absolutely disgusting behavior is coming from the person who last Strategus abused new clans into feeding him troops time and time again (SKoT, GoW, Acre, Berserks), and creating the mega bloc of FCC which was at least as large as any alliance he is accusing of going on now.

EDIT: Someone tell me I have autism for making this post on my day off.

LOLOOLOOLOLOLL

Umm my liege...i didnt join HoC till strat was done...umm

i was there for the almarra siege, if i recall...i was on the attackers side..... for both battles lol


u deff have autism and i love ya for it, but damn son, might wanna get that check brah
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on February 27, 2014, 09:23:56 pm
Then what were you doing on Strategus that makes you so worthy to comment as you are?
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Keshian on February 27, 2014, 09:37:52 pm

Keshian -- Inactive leader of the largest or second largest Strat faction, which made no offensive maneuvers for months.


Really??  Are you really trying to pretend you were more active than FCC was?  The longest stretch in 18 months of fighting we didn't go on the offensive was 30 days when it looked like frisians (which you were a part of at the time a little before gobblins were formed), occitan, lost legion, hospitallers, and chaos were all about to go on the offensive against us - needless to say frisians and occitan kind of poopooed out at the thought of attacking a castle (we took over a dozen castles/cities by fighting) so we went right back to attacking again.

FCC had about 500 battles and FCC battles accounted for almost 1/4 of all the troops lost in all of NA strat.  Don't even try to pretend your boy band alliance of 4 different clans beating up the smallest and weakest factions on the map while walking around in glitched gold bought full plate armor can even compare.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on February 27, 2014, 10:40:21 pm
rofl doesn't change the fact that for the last like four months of strategus you didn't do anything
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Lemon on February 27, 2014, 10:51:34 pm
(click to show/hide)
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 
Sincerely, everyone.
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: Keshian on February 27, 2014, 10:52:26 pm
rofl doesn't change the fact that for the last like four months of strategus you didn't do anything

Huh?  last 4 months was us fighting Central Confederacy and lost legion and before that was hospitallers until we made truce with them and before that us taking some villages and a castle from occitan.  Then about 1-2 weeks later declared end of strat and we just started attacking ourselves.  Gobblins didn't do much that last month and a half (i know you kept telling everyone work and school but there were dozens of other members in the faction that could have attacked), plus SKoT actually put up good defenses and didn't just roll over to your full plate armies and you just idled with no more tiny factions to beat up on.

P.S.  How did we even get off topic like this
(click to show/hide)
- who cares about last strat, its making this a good strategus that counts.  And that means breaking bad habits of trying to always be friendly and kissing ass with everyone else on the map in a war game.
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on February 27, 2014, 10:57:52 pm
rofl kesh right

right
Title: Re: We complain about not having good fights
Post by: HappyPhantom on February 27, 2014, 11:08:17 pm
Can we all just face facts: you're all arseholes and shit at this game. There, now lets move on.