Messages

361

Closed Requests / Re: BAN DaveUKR

« on: March 22, 2011, 01:17:22 am »

wow...I dont even understand some of the posts in this thread. especially daves etc.
and this is not because I am not capable of the english language.

@michael: regardless of me not beeing a "fan" of you I dont even understand whats your business in here? I really dont. I am more than happy if hes banned from EU cause I dont give a fuck about RUScrpg servers and EU4 is down for weeks in case you didnt notice. And just in case you (however) are not able to read the topic I posted (cause your post indicates that) I am not talking about slashing at attackers spawn but placing constr. material which makes it difficult/impossible to access key areas of the siege map
(If you do not understand this, try ask someone to explain, maybe they have the patience to explain to you, but please dont make this thread a fucking whining thread about yourself)


@Dave: hahaha. nice try fooling all the admins with some "clever" idea of why you placed the const. materials. leeching? you fuckin crazy? I dont really care about you leeching. but I saw you TWICE planting constr. material, screenshooting you the third time.
I saw you getting rid of 3 contruction materials at attackers spawn after you got balanced to attackers side.

just stop denying it, more than a handfull of people saw it.

@admins: whats the deal now? your falling for this?

362

Closed Requests / BAN DaveUKR

« on: March 21, 2011, 06:26:23 pm »

playing on EU 6 today and dave was planting construction materials in at least 3 siege maps.
saw him twice and when ever he was defender construction materials appeared.
Several people kept telling him to stop it but he kept on doing it and denying it.

took a screen, not the best one but the "growth" of the material is visual. (not used to taking screens)
was between 17:30 and 18:15

he than got vote kicked by some grey order guy. many drz and grey order guys have seen it aswell.

heres it:
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

363

Closed Requests / Re: Unban Request for Pantara

« on: March 18, 2011, 04:57:02 pm »

Nihtgenga: No, I NEVER wrote that. Having no cloths or armor on is allowed. Not being armed on the other hand, is not allowed.
Several people told him to get some weps and how, so after a couple of rounds, I spectated him, made sure he had no weapons, and told him to get some or get banned.
Instead the round ended, he pressed DONE to start another round, and hide behind a tree. If he was on the page buying weps or not is irrelevant, because spawning unarmed after getting the warning about ban was an active move from his side. HE decided that he wanted to continue to play without a weapon. (If he was afk, as your saying aswell, just makes it worse. People get kicked for being afk).

Didnt say that you said it, did I? As I stated, there were at least 2 other admins around.

cheers

364

Closed Requests / Re: Unban Request for Pantara

« on: March 18, 2011, 12:58:17 pm »

But I can confirm what hes saying. actually one player (not an  admin and there were at least 3 around I noticed) told him how to actually get cloth and that he doesnt have to logg out to get the stuff (he didnt know as he was playing pre patch last time)

all the admins did was saying "get cloth or get kicked" but no one answered his questions

after the one player helped him he sayed he was buying cloth on the website and get them for the next round , next second he was banned.

maybe admins should read the chat aswell, uh?

365

Closed Requests / Re: BAN-request: Armbrust_Schuetze

« on: March 18, 2011, 12:53:44 pm »

same...ironically he (schuetze) tk one himself a map later...out of a very stupid position where his swing had no chance to hit the enemy. so it was pretty much his fault ;-)

but I have to say that it is not good to ride into meele with a couched lance.  but thats no reason to constantly insult the player. and michael. to say that he stands no chance in a 1 on 1 against varyag is a pretty lame thing to say. schütze is actually quite a good player, just has some really really bad manners.

I say give him a longer brake, if I rememeber right he had one allready

366

Beginner's Help and Guides / Re: Lancer cavalry build. To glory!

« on: February 27, 2011, 10:54:30 pm »

again - dont use 31 to calculate. it just takes you to long, you will spend a lot of time at level 30 and therefore should have a liable build with level 30

so you have to cut off 3 skill points if you try this build with level 30 as you have to convert 2 skill points to one attribute point to get 18/18 at level 30.

so if you use this build you will have either 17 agi or 17 str at level 30 giving you either one point less in weapon master or one point less in IF and PS as you dont meet the req. for 6 skillpoints.

so you just miss out to much at level 30. especially if you like to retire to heirloom once you hit 31

367

Beginner's Help and Guides / Re: Lancer cavalry build. To glory!

« on: February 27, 2011, 09:57:18 pm »

yeah, lance on horseback, warspear on foot : P

but if you like your 2 shieldskill there is not much to discuss about ;-)

368

Beginner's Help and Guides / Re: Lancer cavalry build. To glory!

« on: February 27, 2011, 09:52:04 pm »

hey!

well I use a war spear with my horse alt if Im on foot as it doesnt give you any penalties and I do quite well with it. and if I the opponent keeps on downblocking I just use the warspear without a shield.

and even on foot you migh need the shield to get close to archers plus you might not be able to change your weapon when beeing dehorsed if the person is very close to you.

maybe 3 shield skill to use elite cavalry shield?

    * Strength: 18
    * Agility: 18
    * Hit points: 63

    * Converted: 2
    * Ironflesh: 5
    * Power Strike: 6
    * Shield: 3
    * Athletics: 4
    * Riding: 5
    * Horse Archery: 0
    * Power Draw: 0
    * Power Throw: 0
    * Weapon Master: 6

369

Game Balance Discussion / Re: Archery

« on: February 27, 2011, 09:42:39 pm »

What I believe is happening is the arrow is going through the head hitbox, not registering, then registering on the body hitbox.  I've noticed sometimes the arrow will pass through the first person entirely and hit the person behind them.

mh...I have seen this quite often, especially the first two pics.
the person got an arrow in its back or shoulder when he was running/raising his arm or what ever. now like  in the pictures when the arm his hanging loose it looks like the arrow went through the head, which it didnt when it was shot at the person. just an animation inaccuracy.

if you had moved behind the person or he would have raised the arm for an attack its easy to notice.

although the hitboxes are weird sometimes, I can see a projectile flying past my head and the next milisecond it kills me ;-)

370

Beginner's Help and Guides / Re: Lancer cavalry build. To glory!

« on: February 27, 2011, 09:32:03 pm »

well first of all I would calculate with level 30 and not 31.

and if you want to be a deidcated horse man i would get rid of at least 2 ath. points and put one in riding and one in shield.

you might even think of using 0 ath. skill, depending on what style you want to play.

a dedicated horseman for me looks like this

    * Strength: 18
    * Agility: 18
    * Hit points: 65

    * Converted: 2
    * Ironflesh: 6
    * Power Strike: 6
    * Shield: 4
    * Athletics: 1
    * Riding: 6
    * Horse Archery: 0
    * Power Draw: 0
    * Power Throw: 0
    * Weapon Master: 6

    * One Handed: 1
    * Two Handed: 1
    * Polearm: 156
    * Archery: 1
    * Crossbow: 1
    * Throwing: 1

just my 2 cents, really depends on what you want to do with your char.

371

General Discussion / Re: OK its getting a bit much.

« on: February 27, 2011, 09:04:02 pm »

well the rules show on each server ''announcement board''

372

General Discussion / Re: O M G Did the calculator pack fail or has it moved?

« on: February 27, 2011, 08:47:26 pm »

works perfect for me, did you klick on the first grey box? 

373

General Discussion / Re: OK its getting a bit much.

« on: February 27, 2011, 12:26:14 pm »

@Lilith

well he stated in his first post that it was a fixed ladder allready in the game. so a non destructable.

@Franklin

although ift it is one of those small ladders which are very steep you need a really, really long time to get up there and if it was the end of the round and the other team was having way more members still alive, I can understand that. because they would have never been able to get up there in time so it would have been a nice gesture to get down.

374

Beginner's Help and Guides / Re: Requesting Input/Guidance on Roman Legionnaire Build

« on: February 26, 2011, 08:35:12 pm »

Mh...If you choose lances as your throwing weapon I wouldnt put any wpf points into throwing. as you only got 2 or 4 lances to throw you will use them only on very close range and I believe that in this case any wpf points would be wasted. I have a hybrid thrower/pole with over 100 wpf points in throwing and I cant really tell a difference to 0 wpf.
maybe you should make an throwing alt before you do your legionnaire to check if you feel a magnificant difference between 0 and 100 points, especially on close range.

375

Game Balance Discussion / Re: new strength requirements for two handed weapons and polearms

« on: February 26, 2011, 08:23:35 pm »

-1