Author Topic: Epic fail to small clans  (Read 4845 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Erasmas

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 483
  • Infamy: 138
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • The crows had come
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Grey Order
  • Game nicks: Erasmas_the_Grey
Re: Epic fail to small clans
« Reply #60 on: March 16, 2014, 09:37:18 pm »
+1
I had admins/a dev check things for me and they found multiple people in NA factions confirmed as multiaccounting who never got banned once their names were given to Meow (the person in charge of banning all that stuff back then)

Infact I still have a saved chatlog from then-

5:25 PM <Shik> I'm pretty sure not just FCC is multi accounting
5:26 PM <Shik> my point is that the rules seem to have a lot of loopholes
5:26 PM <Meow> didn't check anyone else

(the "didn't check anyone else" is referring to only checking UIF factions, fyi)

QED. Thank you.

[EDIT]

Anyways, the case is closed for me. And clearly for devs too, and I respect that.  I understand the sentiments, but it would be much better if we all concentrate on current affairs.
« Last Edit: March 16, 2014, 09:53:51 pm by Erasmas »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Harpag

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 914
  • Infamy: 263
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • jebać merców
    • View Profile
  • Faction: UIF
  • Game nicks: Harpag_the_Grey
Re: Epic fail to small clans
« Reply #61 on: March 16, 2014, 11:12:06 pm »
+1
It was not done "anonymously" as stated, that is for sure. Plenty of people who multiaccounted back then didn't get banned, and there are still people who do it who aren't banned.

I had admins/a dev check things for me and they found multiple people in NA factions confirmed as multiaccounting who never got banned once their names were given to Meow (the person in charge of banning all that stuff back then)

Infact I still have a saved chatlog from then-

5:25 PM <Shik> I'm pretty sure not just FCC is multi accounting
5:26 PM <Shik> my point is that the rules seem to have a lot of loopholes
5:26 PM <Meow> didn't check anyone else

(the "didn't check anyone else" is referring to only checking UIF factions, fyi)

I don't know you, but thank you, thank you, thank you very much. I knew that all of us have been cheated but I had no proof. I have no injuries, I just fuck it now, but let no one tries it with us again.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Fips

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1217
  • Infamy: 290
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Holy Roman Empire
  • Game nicks: Fips_HRE
Re: Epic fail to small clans
« Reply #62 on: March 16, 2014, 11:21:50 pm »
+1

Offline Keshian

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1176
  • Infamy: 992
  • cRPG Player
  • Diggity diggity
    • View Profile
  • Faction: FCC (Bridgeburner, Unicorn, Cavalieres, Narwhal)
  • Game nicks: Red-haired bitch from hell
  • IRC nick: Bitch, pleasssse.
Re: Epic fail to small clans
« Reply #63 on: March 16, 2014, 11:35:25 pm »
0
It was not done "anonymously" as stated, that is for sure. Plenty of people who multiaccounted back then didn't get banned, and there are still people who do it who aren't banned.

I had admins/a dev check things for me and they found multiple people in NA factions confirmed as multiaccounting who never got banned once their names were given to Meow (the person in charge of banning all that stuff back then)

Infact I still have a saved chatlog from then-

5:25 PM <Shik> I'm pretty sure not just FCC is multi accounting
5:26 PM <Shik> my point is that the rules seem to have a lot of loopholes
5:26 PM <Meow> didn't check anyone else

(the "didn't check anyone else" is referring to only checking UIF factions, fyi)


Lol, the "didn't check anyone else" was referring to me dipshit - hence the reference to FCC.  Then I proved my innocence and was unbanned.  Had nothing to do with UIF.  Funny all these grey order guys congratulating you. 

Guys you should know imisshotmail constantly makes shit up.  hes a british player who plays primarily in NA.
http://keshoxford.com/  - Where middle-eastern meets red-hot and spicy!

"[Strat 5]... war game my ass, tis more like a popularity contest"  Plumbo

Offline Osiris

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1449
  • Infamy: 324
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Merc
  • Game nicks: Osiris. Aethelstan
  • IRC nick: _Osiris_
Re: Epic fail to small clans
« Reply #64 on: March 16, 2014, 11:37:42 pm »
+2
no clearly anti uif paid chadz to ban them
i make terrible warband videos! https://youtu.be/jUdVGIOuULk

Offline GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1509
  • Infamy: 515
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Daruvian, GOBBLINKINGGREATLEADER
Re: Epic fail to small clans
« Reply #65 on: March 16, 2014, 11:43:37 pm »
+1
2nd/1st highest renown value in EU last Strat went to Osiris, a lone wolf for most of the end of Strat. Currently in EU the 2nd highest renown is another lone wolf.

Incentivise top renown somehow? Because large factions spread out their renown amongst members when stomping, whereas it looks like loners get a higher proportion of it by fighting all their own battles. That looks like sufficient incentive, if a large faction stomps and 'wins' then they've got nothing to do, no renown unless they attack their old allies, whereas anyone who keeps raiding and trolling them after they gain scumbag victory would get crazy amounts of renown.


highest renown went to whoever gear bugged the hardest

yep you got it

Offline imisshotmail

  • Permanently Banned
  • **
  • Renown: 504
  • Infamy: 428
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Epic fail to small clans
« Reply #66 on: March 16, 2014, 11:55:44 pm »
+1

Lol, the "didn't check anyone else" was referring to me dipshit - hence the reference to FCC.  Then I proved my innocence and was unbanned.  Had nothing to do with UIF. 

no this was in a private conversation, not in a public IRC, I think i'd know what it was about. It was before you got banned even.

Offline Little Lord Lollipop

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 582
  • Infamy: 49
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Always Take The Shot
  • Game nicks: Frumpty_Dumpty_ATTS
Re: Epic fail to small clans
« Reply #67 on: March 17, 2014, 12:51:49 am »
+4
One positive change would be to give strat ticks for x1 multi's. Smaller clans are unable to banner stack to maintain a multi and their members typically spend more time on an x1.  This would be an easy change to implement and would give smaller clans a minor boost in strategus.
Dear Little Lord Lollipop
You have received a warning for being a total twat.
Best Regards,
The cRPG Forum Team

Offline Zaharist

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 182
  • Infamy: 76
  • cRPG Player
  • Carpe Diem
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Druzhina
Re: Epic fail to small clans
« Reply #68 on: March 17, 2014, 08:31:20 am »
+5
may be less talking more raiding?
Igni et ferro