Author Topic: Is it 7.7 or 6.0 Weight that has no WPF penalty?  (Read 608 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline _Tak_

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 459
  • Infamy: 195
  • cRPG Player
  • Retired Dev of FI2
    • View Profile
    • mod :D
  • Game nicks: LC
Is it 7.7 or 6.0 Weight that has no WPF penalty?
« on: September 16, 2014, 01:56:11 am »
0
Im not good in maths and i heard alot of people say its 6 weight or the 7 one. which one is true for no wpf penalty?

Offline Rico

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1021
  • Infamy: 158
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Rico, Mila
Re: Is it 7.7 or 6.0 Weight that has no WPF penalty?
« Reply #1 on: September 16, 2014, 02:00:29 am »
0
It is 10.0

Edit: But multiply hand armor weight with 4.0 and head armor weight with 2.0 before you add the single values together to receive the actual number that must be smaller than 10.0
Streaming cRPG, Supreme Commander and Age of Empires II on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/HeavenTV

Offline Macropus

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1668
  • Infamy: 296
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Macropus
Re: Is it 7.7 or 6.0 Weight that has no WPF penalty?
« Reply #2 on: September 16, 2014, 02:01:06 am »
0
It's 2x[helmet_weight]+4x[gauntlets_weight]+[body_weight]+[leg_weight]<10 that has no wpf penalty iirc.

Offline Mallets

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 394
  • Infamy: 22
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Mallets and his family

Offline korppis

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 404
  • Infamy: 51
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Ninja
Re: Is it 7.7 or 6.0 Weight that has no WPF penalty?
« Reply #4 on: September 16, 2014, 07:23:15 am »
0