Messages

1

Closed Requests / Re: No nomination, just the evidence against Lilith/Nuffen

« on: March 03, 2011, 09:22:25 pm »

Im getting tired of this bullshit. I'm trying to help the communicty with enforcing the rules so people dont go on tking and other bullshit. This to let the majority enjoy the game without getting harassed by a small minority of raging trolls.
This Im doing on my own spare time, and Im using a lot of my playtime to do this. Im not getting paid you know. Im using a lot of time to make sure people get fair threatment, but some people, like olwen and scotsman insist on not having to follow the rules. Im not gonna waste more time on shit like this, and Im gonna ignore stupid discussions like this.

PS: If someone got SERIOUS feedback on my admining, please send me a pm.

I have serious feedback for your admining, and I will publicly state it so that you can't weasel out of it.

You lack rationality.
You are inconsistent.
You bend rules on the fly.
You selectively ignore blatant evidence against you.
You lie.

Now that I've shown some hard evidence, you are playing the victim card.

"I'm just an honest admin guv', honest and hard working!"

2

Closed Requests / Re: No nomination, just the evidence against Lilith/Nuffen

« on: March 03, 2011, 09:10:10 pm »

No, you just openly defend them from being banned. Im an abuser in your eyes every time I ban someone who tk intentionally. Even if he openly admits it. ITs not me you got a problem with, its the rules.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


It's about the rules is it?

3

Closed Requests / Re: No nomination, just the evidence against Lilith/Nuffen

« on: March 03, 2011, 09:02:13 pm »

SCotsman: stop bullshitting. You've clearly stated your not accepting the rules. You should be in your right to tk whoever you want whenever you want. As you dont accept the rules, we dont accept you as a player.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


You can't count.

Oh and "common sense" tells you that at the end of the round means probably unintentional. I wonder how you'll bend the rules this time.

Notice how Mr Awesome, at the time of the incident that spiralled out of control to my banning, who is a complete third party to the incident, applied his "common sense" as well.

4

Closed Requests / Re: No nomination, just the evidence against Lilith/Nuffen

« on: March 03, 2011, 08:51:49 pm »

He banned you because he thought you teamkilled him, given the prior history there, revenge threats and everything.
There are server logs for exactly such reasons, when you forget to take your safety screenshot, you will always find an admin who can double check for you.

And where's the admin who will double check for me Leiknir, or anyone? Any players word against an admin is worthless, not to mention this "get out of jail free card" bullshit policy of "admin's don't need evidence" and "common sense".

Let's not pretend the whole thing is impartial and fair now.

5

Closed Requests / Re: No nomination, just the evidence against Lilith/Nuffen

« on: March 03, 2011, 08:48:30 pm »

i didn't trashtalk him second time

so he is an admin and he can do whatever he wants and disappointing people and when someone has the balls to complain he can just say sorry it was a mistake ? what if it was anybody else who can't draw lights on the facts ? you get banned by a guy because he has problems with you and you just should sit here and wait that it ends ? or apologising or whatever ? i told him he was wrong, he said i was lying, what if i didn't take the time to take a screen of the logs ? this guys is a pain for crpg community, he doesn't deserve to be an admin

Totally playing devils advocate here to point out how fucked up the admin system is, but one your clan mates himself (who is an admin) said that admins don't need evidence. Anyone with any idea about what unchecked power does will call bullshit on that.

6

Closed Requests / Re: No nomination, just the evidence against Lilith/Nuffen

« on: March 03, 2011, 08:39:49 pm »

Intentional teamkill, you even admitt it was intentional, and only a kick? You got lucky there that no other admin was there/faster and would have just banned you straight away. Why do you want a warning? You teamkilled on purpose, you admitt it. "He Olwen, I know its hard, but please dont teamkill on purpose?"

This is the crap some admins have to deal with, play with the rules, or play on some other server.

The ban you got was a mistake (as it was too late for the real teamkill), and got removed as soon as proof showing otherwise turned up, no Idea why the drama here.

Is this as opposed to stating clearly that it wasn't intentional? And yet the admins totally ignore that fact anyway?

Oh wait, sorry. "Common sense."

7

Closed Requests / Re: No nomination, just the evidence against Lilith/Nuffen

« on: March 03, 2011, 08:28:06 pm »

Son of a bitch? I counted at least 10 lines of threats and insults, which I didnt even reply to.
You did three insults that you normally get banned for. In this perspective..

I unbanned you 30 sec after I saw the screenshot, and I apologised.

Sound's awfully familiar.

8

General Discussion / Re: Polls on Wooki and Lilith/Nuffen - DISCUSSION

« on: March 01, 2011, 01:35:02 pm »

How is it that you can make accusations backed up by something there is no evidence it actually happened the way you are describing it, yet you expect lilith to back up her every word with proof.

Also, from what I've seen in game, you stand up to your nick, and I'm happy you were finally banned (even though for something else and only temporarily), because your flaming in game was annyoing to say the least.

Because I'm not the one in a position of power and responsibility. The moment people in a position of power stop being ACCOUNTABLE by producing HARD EVIDENCE they start being ABUSIVE of that power. He has everything to prove and me nothing: innocent until proven guilty.

9

General Discussion / Re: Polls on Wooki and Lilith/Nuffen - DISCUSSION

« on: March 01, 2011, 12:23:22 am »

And you've yet to answer where you  conjured the number 2 from when relating to the number of TKs I allegedly done.

In fact, you've yet to show where you pull any piece of information from except your own biased view of the whole situation.

10

General Discussion / Re: Polls on Wooki and Lilith/Nuffen - DISCUSSION

« on: March 01, 2011, 12:11:14 am »

Challenge accepted.

It got a river streaming like a L through a village. 1/3rd of the village is "under" the L, and theres a small bridge leading over to the major part. This bridge continues the gate that goes stright through the whole map and ends on the foot of some hills where the attackers usually come from.

From the attackers side, you'll see farmland on left side, while there is a building on the right side. This buildings roof goes nearly down to the ground, and is very easy to jump up on.
You were 4 alive people, he was only 1. He was on this roof, probably to make sure you wouldnt sneak up from behind. He was easy to see, and as mentioned, it was very easy to jump up on the roof. Thats where you abused your power and poll-kicked him, while he was not breaking any rules at all.


The incident with the ping that bruce refers to happened at the field by river map, after watching the guy "teleporting" around making it very hard for others to play, as he never was where you should expect him to be, I kicked him for destroying the game for the others. I gave him plenty of time to fix his ping.

Didn't I say couple of posts back eveything you put forward as evidence is totally anecdotal and hearsay and not substantive at all? Yes I did.

11

Closed Requests / Re: Free Merc_Xant

« on: February 28, 2011, 09:34:26 pm »

Okay, so you didn't start the nomination because you were kicked. My post still stands.

So wait. Let me get this straight. You are RETROSPECTIVELY justifying your initially flawed reasoning?

I'd like to see that stand in a court of law.

12

General Discussion / Re: Polls on Wooki and Lilith/Nuffen - DISCUSSION

« on: February 28, 2011, 09:31:59 pm »

Yes, I have kicked some people with higher than 600 ping after theyve messed up on the battlefield. But never in the situation you described.

Bullshit. As if your memory is that good. You've already said that I was once kicked by you for polling someone on a roof top; which is completely wrong.

Evidence? None. Not surprised. Not one bit.

13

General Discussion / Re: Polls on Wooki and Lilith/Nuffen - DISCUSSION

« on: February 27, 2011, 08:05:04 pm »

I just read that. Seems like you did an intentional attack on a teammate. Sounds like good evidence to me

Yes, on the SECOND matter (stabbing Ganon for a laugh). I openly admit I was wrong there. However, I had tked right at the end of the round prior to this. That WAS accidental, and this appalling excuse of an admin somehow linked the two incidents. He didn't even get his facts right, accusing me of TWO TKs when there was in actuality only ONE.

And, to top it all off, he has no evidence: no logs, no screenshots, no videos, nothing. His defence is "I am an admin."

14

General Discussion / Re: Polls on Wooki and Lilith/Nuffen - DISCUSSION

« on: February 27, 2011, 07:58:58 pm »

Ok.
This is kinda sad, I think. AngryScotsman, youve already admitted that the tk you got kicked for was intentional.
If anyone wanna get this confirmed, look at his own post here:
http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,2493.0.html
So then thats out of the discussion.

Then to the poll kick that Ronrinesu is pointing out, I remember that insident. A guy was on a roof, that was VERY easy to access, on a huge front. It gave him the back free, but that was all. Angryscotsman then abused his poll-power to try to cheat his way to easy victory by poll kicking the person. In this action AngryScotsman dis an abuse that is worse than anything Ive ever done.

Hes also stated that the rules doesnt apply to him. If he wanna tk people as a joke, he is free to do that. He disregard the rules, and should not be allowed to play the game.

This is why he hates me, and he dont deserve any more answers. Please ignore him.

And this is why you shouldn't be an admin Lilith. In that same link you provide as evidence it clearly states in my post "I refuse to admit intention..." with reasons following.

You have no idea what the hell evidence is.

EDIT: And just before you spew out more bullshit, I will clearly state here why I have a problem with you.

I TKed unintentionally or intentionally. I know it was unintentional. The burden of proof is on you to show that it was intentional. You have no evidence of this at all. Your master defence for your lack of reasoning is that "admins don't need evidence" among other autocratic bullshit.

You are irrational: you are unfit to be an admin.

15

General Discussion / Re: Polls on Wooki and Lilith/Nuffen - DISCUSSION

« on: February 27, 2011, 07:50:39 pm »

You don't need enlightenment, just some common sense ;)

I read right through your bullshit and thats the comeback you have? Noted.