Author Topic: [Ban] Sister_Nicka & DEPLOY_SHIELDS  (Read 646 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline _GTX_

  • I <3 Shemaforash
  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 535
  • Infamy: 960
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
  • O===((:::::::::::::::>
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Kalmarunionen
  • Game nicks: GTX
  • IRC nick: GTX
[Ban] Sister_Nicka & DEPLOY_SHIELDS
« on: February 10, 2015, 03:35:53 pm »
1. Name of your character involved
Kalmarunionen_GTX

2. Name of offending character(s)
Sister_Nicka
DEPLOY_SHIELDS

3. Time and server, as accurately as possible
15:12, EU_1

4. Written description of what happened, the whole story. Also what happened before and after.
Well it was just the general GTX bashing on EU_1, which i can live with and won't screen or anything, but i will when it comes to extremes. This time they wanted to play around with the polls, since they knew they would probably go through with all the GTX bashing that was on the server. The first poll was done by DEPLOY_SHIELDS after i was among the last ones alive, and i was just trying to find a better engagement. After 10 seconds of running, he alrdy polls me. I'm not even sure flags was present at this point. (Afaik I'm not breaking any rules, because flags were not broken or anything. If this is breaking the rules, by just ''delaying'' for 10 seconds, then a lot of cav and ranged should be banned)

It goes through, and i rejoin. Then after rejoining they bash me some more, and then suddenly Sister_Nicka does an even more random banpoll, which also goes through, because of the population on the server. This time they can't even make up a random reason, since it's just so random.

5. Why you think the offender did what he did.*
Kids. I really don't know what else, other than immaturity.

6. Multiple Screenshots
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)


7. Names of players who witnessed what happened.**
- Kalmarunionen_Allram
- Vanguard_Spamwhore
- Hawerek
« Last Edit: February 10, 2015, 05:50:32 pm by _GTX_ »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline marlla

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 54
  • Infamy: 6
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Kalmarunionen
  • Game nicks: Kalmarunionen_Allram
  • IRC nick: marlla
Re: [Ban] Sister_Nicka & DEPLOY_SHIELDS
« Reply #1 on: February 10, 2015, 04:28:36 pm »
I saw the rage/lame polls that was made against GTX :( they had no reason behind them.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Perverz

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 381
  • Infamy: 180
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Barabe_Perverz
Re: [Ban] Sister_Nicka & DEPLOY_SHIELDS
« Reply #2 on: February 10, 2015, 05:35:57 pm »
i was there... gtx was delaying... runing from fight for almost a minute.
that was the  reason for 1st poll on him.


 
BARABE:
those without the necessary properties of good in human society, coarse, vulgar and violent man, scumbags

Offline _GTX_

  • I <3 Shemaforash
  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 535
  • Infamy: 960
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
  • O===((:::::::::::::::>
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Kalmarunionen
  • Game nicks: GTX
  • IRC nick: GTX
Re: [Ban] Sister_Nicka & DEPLOY_SHIELDS
« Reply #3 on: February 10, 2015, 05:42:21 pm »
i was there... gtx was delaying... runing from fight for almost a minute.
that was the  reason for 1st poll on him.
1 min? I'm tired of your hate against me, especially when it brings these false accusations. I ran for 10-20 secs tops, and i have seen a HELL of a lot of people do it for a lot longer, and never get polled. This is in particular archers and cav. Ontop of that i don't think it's against the rules, aslong as the flags are functioning properly, which they were.

EDIT: You know what, look at the first picture. Even though there is only 2 lines above the kickpoll in that screenshot, you can still see one of my teammates get killed. So clearly i was not delaying for 1 min, you absolute lying little prick. There was some chatting going on at the time aswell, which almost certainly proved that there is probably not 1 min between those 2 things. So fuck off with your pathetic lies Pervers. I know you hate me and will try anything, but this is a new low.

If the admins wanna be sure, check the logs. I supose there is timestamps on the messages.
« Last Edit: February 10, 2015, 05:52:51 pm by _GTX_ »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Perverz

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 381
  • Infamy: 180
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Barabe_Perverz
Re: [Ban] Sister_Nicka & DEPLOY_SHIELDS
« Reply #4 on: February 10, 2015, 10:58:00 pm »
first of all i dont hate you, i cant hate. hating is deviation. i just  dont like you cause you are douche, but thats another thing and thats dont have anything with this request lad.

and sencond: im perverz not pervers.... keep calm and sorry for my gramar ;)


much love!


perverz musharaf ;)
BARABE:
those without the necessary properties of good in human society, coarse, vulgar and violent man, scumbags

Offline _GTX_

  • I <3 Shemaforash
  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 535
  • Infamy: 960
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
  • O===((:::::::::::::::>
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Kalmarunionen
  • Game nicks: GTX
  • IRC nick: GTX
Re: [Ban] Sister_Nicka & DEPLOY_SHIELDS
« Reply #5 on: February 10, 2015, 11:10:29 pm »
first of all i dont hate you, i cant hate. hating is deviation. i just  dont like you cause you are douche, but thats another thing and thats dont have anything with this request lad.

and sencond: im perverz not pervers.... keep calm and sorry for my gramar ;)


much love!


perverz musharaf ;)
Thats essentially exactly the same thing, because the motive for saying what you did is not changed in any way. But i love how you tried to avoid that by adding ''much love'' and other crap. Ironic how i'm the douche, when you're the one openly lying.

Anyway. I already explained how it's easily visible in the first screenshot that i was not running for a minute. I wonder why you don't respond to that, since that was the main point of my reponse.

I'm done discussion something that is not up to discussion, it's a fact. The admin can look at the material that were given, and possibly the logs for timestamps, and then make a decision. It's quite a strong case, so your lies won't interrupt justice.
« Last Edit: February 10, 2015, 11:14:01 pm by _GTX_ »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline POOPHAMMER

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1509
  • Infamy: 328
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
  • yes thats me irl
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Barabe
  • Game nicks: POOPHAMMER
Re: [Ban] Sister_Nicka & DEPLOY_SHIELDS
« Reply #6 on: February 11, 2015, 01:54:11 am »
Yeah I am sorry I was pretty drunk when that happened I will accept the punishment handed to me
Uther Pendragon: dont worry i wasnt planning on trusting you anyway

Offline Patoson

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 784
  • Infamy: 138
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight
    • View Profile
Re: [Ban] Sister_Nicka & DEPLOY_SHIELDS
« Reply #7 on: February 11, 2015, 03:05:18 pm »
Sister_Nicka banned for 1 day for poll abuse.